PRINCIPLES AND GUIDES
FOR A WELL-MANAGED FOREST
A report by the Sustainable Forest Management
and Resource Management Committees
National Association of State Foresters
-
February 2003
Background
The exact definition of
a well-managed forest will be debated as long as there are interest groups
that value different sets of attributes available from a forest. There
are, however, a number of frameworks commonly perceived to address key
components of a well-managed forest, e.g., the World Summit on Sustainable
Development, the United Nations Forum on Forests Proposals for Action, the
Montreal Process Criteria and Indicators of Sustainable Forests, and the
International Forest Industry Roundtable. Fundamental to all is the
premise that forests are recognized as a community of interacting plants,
animals, soil, water, air, and people within a major landscape – no longer
just a concentration of trees.
Introduction
Forest owners as well as the general public
are increasingly aware of promoting and working towards sustainability for
the nations forests. Interest in understanding how to pursue well-managed
forests can, at times, be confusing due to the wide range of definitions,
goals, and perspectives being promoted by stakeholders with different
interests. The National Association of State Foresters developed these
Principles and Guides as a means to assist in assessing the potential
effectiveness of any system or program’s capacity to guide a forest owner
or manager in efforts to achieve a well-managed forest while attaining
his/her objectives.
The Principles and Guides should not
be used as a directive nor are they an appropriate basis for
determining eligibility for incentives related to federal cost share
programs. They are designed to help state forestry
agencies, forest landowners, and other interested members of the public
sort through the options available to determine which systems and programs
meet widely accepted tests of appropriate content and outcomes. Size
or scale of the management unit or ownership is an essential consideration
in their use.
I. Principles of a Well-Managed Forest
Any system or program professing to result in
a well-managed forest when implemented, should address the premise of the
following principles in its requirements for planning, implementation and
assessment:
1. Contribute to the Conservation of
Biological Diversity of the Forest and the Landscape in Which it Resides
2. Maintain or Improve Productive
Capacity
3. Maintain the Health and Vigor of
the Forest and its Landscape/Watershed
4. Protect Soil and Water Resources
5. Consider Carbon Cycles
6. Consider Socio-Economic Benefits and Impacts
7. Comply with Laws and Legally Adopted Rules and Implement
Applicable Guidelines in States Not Using
the Regulatory Approach
II Performance Guides to Address the
Core Principles in
Evaluating Program / System Implementation
An
evaluation of the systems and plans/practices to determine whether the
Core Principles have been addressed can be done using the following
Performance Guides:
- Contribute to the
Conservation of Biological Diversity of the Forest and Landscape in
Which it Resides
Systems
A. Available
expertise is sought for assessing biodiversity considerations at the site
and landscape levels.
B. Rare and
endangered species and plant communities are identified and their
protection or enhancement is
addressed.
C. Forest
dynamics, major disturbances and catastrophic events are factored into
decision making.
Plans and Practices
A.
Necessary expertise (consultants,
State Forestry, Natural Heritage Program staff, etc.) has been utilized to
assess the biodiversity contribution of the property.
B. The
forest’s diversity, uniqueness and risks (pests, fire, weather, etc.) have
been identified and are a consideration
in management.
C. Forest
dynamics, major disturbances and catastrophic events are factored into
biodiversity decision making.
- Maintain or Improve
Productive Capacity
Systems
A.
Timber and non-timber products and
habitats are identified for the forest.
B. Long-term
and short-term productive capacities and targets are established.
C. Targets
are sustainable.
D.
Appropriate science and technology is used.
Plans and Practices
A.
The productive capacity of the
forest has been mapped for timber and significant non-timber products have
been
identified.
B. Growth,
mortality and harvest rates of the forest types have been determined.
C.
Regeneration after harvest is planned and successfully implemented.
D. Long-term site capacity is
maintained.
E. Harvest,
utilization, and marketing are efficient.
F. Loggers
and other contractors that have been trained are used.
G.
Appropriate expertise is used regarding wildlife management.
H. Habitats,
including sites at environmental risk and with ecological/cultural
uniqueness, are identified and a
consideration of management.
- Maintain the Health and
Vigor of the Forest and its Landscape/Watershed
Systems
A.
Tree species selection, stocking
levels, age class distribution, integrated pest management and fuel
loadings are
addressed with the objective of reducing the risk of insect
and disease outbreaks and unwanted wildfire and
promoting long-term forest
vigor.
B.
Cooperation regarding forest risk assessments, monitoring, prevention and
incident response is encouraged.
C. Chemicals
are used appropriately and safely within the manufacturer’s
recommendations.
D. Grazing is
managed to prevent negative impacts.
A. Tree species selection, stocking
levels, spacing, age-class distribution, regeneration methods, insect and
disease
outbreaks, fuel loads, and wildfires are managed to reduce risk
and insure long-term forest vigor.
B. Fuel
loads, insect and disease populations and overall forest vigor are
addressed.
C. Approaches
to monitoring, prevention, and incident response are in place and include
cooperation with local, state
and federal agencies and neighboring
landowners as appropriate.
D. Grazing is
managed to prevent negative impacts.
E.
Introduction and spread of invasive non-native flora and fauna is
addressed.
- Protect Soil and Water
Resources
Systems
A.
Relevant mapped, soils, terrain and
water resources (streams, ponds, wetlands) data are used.
B. Management
practices to insure soil stability, protect and enhance soil productivity
and water quality are used.
C. Best
management practices to protect soil and water during all management
activities are used.
Plans and
Practices
A. Current mapped data on soils and
terrain is included in the plan and used in management.
B. Storm dynamics are recognized and
planned for.
C. Soil
stability, water quality and soil productivity are protected.
D.
Appropriate guides and plans are in place and followed in road placement,
design, maintenance and retirement,
especially at stream crossings.
E. Fire use,
management and response is appropriately planned and conducted.
F. State
Best Management Practices are understood and incorporated in plans and
complied with during all phases
of management activities.
G. Wetland
hydrological function and aquatic habitat are a consideration in
management.
- Consider Carbon Cycles
Systems
A.
Forest biomass considerations by
forest types, age classes and successional stages are
addressed.
B. The
management of forest ecosystems in a manner that enhances carbon budgets
and cycles is promoted.
Plans and
Practices
A. Carbon cycles are considered in the
forest management plan.
- Consider Socio-Economic
Benefits and Impacts
Systems
A. The system
recognizes that production and consumption of wood and non-wood products,
their volume, value
(including value added through downstream processing),
their supply and consumption are important.
B. Recreation
and tourism is promoted consistent with the health of the forest and the
nature of the ownership and
owner objectives.
C.
Appropriate economic and social values of the forest are considered.
Plans and Practices
A.
Sound economic approaches,
considering both long-term and short-term goals, are used when harvesting
both
wood and non-wood products.
B. Available
resources are used to identify, manage and protect unique forest features.
C. Unique
biological, ecological, geological and cultural sites are considered in
the forest management plan.
- Comply with Laws and Rules
and Implement Applicable Guidelines in States Not Using the Regulatory
Approach
Systems
A.
Conformance to all local, state and
federal laws is required.
B.
Appropriate input is expected.
C. Monitoring
of implementation is expected.
Plans and Practices
A. Local, state and federal laws,
regulations and state BMPs are followed.
B. Operations
are planned, conducted and comply with safety rules.
C. The
impacts on neighbors and the community are considered during operations.
D. Aesthetics
are considered in plans and operations.
E.
Conversion to other land uses is only done according to local land use
plans and ordinances.
|
Sustainable Forest
Management Committee 2002-2003 |
Forest Resource
Management Committee 2002-2003 |
|
|
|
|
James E. Brown, Chairman |
Paul D. Frey, Chairman |
Oregon
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
|
|
E. Austin Short, III |
John C. Burwell |
Delaware
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
|
|
J. Fred Allen |
Timothy C. Boyce |
Georgia
|
Alabama
|
|
|
|
|
Bernie Hubbard |
Philip Bryce |
Michigan
|
New Hampshire
|
|
|
|
|
Ray Sowers |
Ray Sowers |
South Dakota
|
South Dakota
|
|
|
|
|
Steven G. Scott |
Raymond G. Aslin |
Tennessee
|
Kansas
|
|
|
|
|
Andrea E. Tuttle |
James R. Grace |
California
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas A. Dupree |
Gene L. Francisco |
Rhode Island
|
Wisconsin
|
|
|
|
|
Conrad M. Motyka |
Thomas W. Osterman |
Vermont
|
Wyoming
|
|
|
|
NASF
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Gerald Rose, NASF
Mike Higgs, USDA Forest Service,
State and Private Forestry/CF
|